(intentionally cheesy image)
"Great romance" is full of larger than life
elements. You love each other at firs sight but you can't be together. You hate
each other at first sight but are forced to be together. Your separated by an
impossible socio-economic gulf.
Your love is kidnapped by pirates. You have amnesia, being blackmailed,
and the object of your affection doesn't know you exist. Your love is forbidden
yet it is unstoppable.
Fittingly, on classic romance covers the heroes and heroines
with perfect skin, heaving bosoms, and lustrous hair strike dramatic poses in front
of dramatic backgrounds. Contemporary, photographic covers are not quite as
theatrical but the idea is the same.
Okay, I admit, these over the top stories can be a lot of
fun. There's nothing wrong with enjoying them. I have one little problem
though: I can't imagine those couples beyond the wedding bells.
Ordinary life doesn't fit them. Domesticity seems so
unromantic—no grand gestures, moon-lit beaches, and raging seas. I doubt those
couples would last long.
I happen to think that real romance lives in the small
things. To me the most romantic scene I've ever seen is in Fargo: Margie, the
pregnant police chief gets a call at dawn. She has to get up to go to the crime
scene, and her husband insists on getting up too to make her breakfast, even
though he's barely conscious. Now, that's true love. The movie ends with
them—two ordinary people—in bed, talking about duck stamps.
It was only recently, reading Cole Riann's review of Hanging Loose that I drew a connection
between my fondness of the above-mentioned scene and the type of romance I tend
to write. I'm not capable of composing stories with grand gestures and grand
emotions. It's just not in me, but I take pleasure in exploring love in the
details. And that's pretty much it.