Every time I hear an author says they write from themselves I get
ranty. Most of the time the hidden meaning behind that declaration is that they
don't want to deal with pesky stuff like being edited. That's just damn right
foolish, in my opinion. Artistic integrity, purity of voice, blah, blah, blah.
Do these people seriously think their writing is flawless? Especially brand new
authors?
Not all editors created equal, but a good one—and right one
for you—will help you get better at what you do. It stings to hear that
something in you writing doesn't work, and the first instinct is to kick
against it. At least that's how I am. However, considering the feedback has
always resulted in an improvement for me.
What really rankles me about the "I write for
myself" statement is that it implies that the person uttering it is above
us rabble that care about commercial success. I'm sorry, but the starving
artist ideal is a big pile of stink. (Personally, I don't even aspire to be an
artist, but a craftsman. My goal is to entertain.)
There's a strange notion floating around that it's somehow
not right to earn money with something you enjoy. As if you only deserved to
get paid if you hate your job. Suffering and self-sacrifice is pre-requisite.
Whenever I read those words, I roll my eyes and move the writer to the bottom of my to-read list - if not off it completely.
ReplyDeleteIt's a strange thing to hear from anyone who bothers to publish their books.
Delete